Over the last two days we had the Open Subtitles Summit here in New York. It was very exciting to feel the energy in the room to make a change to media accessibility – I am sure we will see much development over the next 12 months. We spoke much about HTML5 video and standards and had many discussions about subtitles, captions, and other accessibility information.
On Wednesday we had a discussion about metadata and I quickly realized that “your metadata is not my metadata”: everyone used the word for something different. So, I suggested to have a metadata discussion on Thursday where we would put a structure onto all of this, identify what kinds of metadata we have and whether and how it should be supported in HTML5 standards.
Our basic findings are very simple and widely accepted. There are three fundamentally different types of metadata:
- Technical metadata about video: information about the format of the resource – things that can be determined automatically and are non-controversial, such as the width, height, framerate, audio sample rate etc. This information can be used to, e.g. decide if a video is appropriate for a certain device.
- Semantic metadata about video: semantic information about the video resource – e.g. license, author, publication date, version, attribution, title, description. This information is good for search and identification.
- Timed semantic metadata: semantic information that is associated with time intervals of the video, not with the full video – e.g. active speaker, location, date-time, objects.
As we talked about this further, however, we identified subclasses of these generic types that are very important to identify because they will be handled differently.
We found that semantic metadata can be separated into universal metadata and domain-specific metadata. Universal metadata is semantic metadata that can basically be applied to any content. There is very little of that and the W3C Media Annotations WG has done a pretty good job in identifying it. Domain-specific metadata is such metadata that only applies to some content, e.g. all the videos about sports have metadata such as game scores, players, or type of sport.
As for adding such metadata into media resources, we discussed that it makes sense to have the universal metadata explicitly spelled out and to have a generic means to associate name-value pairs with resource. Of course it will all be stored in databases, but there was also a requirement to have it encoded into the media resource – and in our discussion case: into external captions or subtitle files.
As for timed metadata – it is possible to separate this into metadata that is only relevant as part of a subtitle or caption file, because the metadata relates to a certain word or a word sequence, and into independent timed metadata that can be stored in, e.g. JSON or some similar format.
Since we are particularly interested in subtitles and captions, the timed metadata that is associated with words or word sequences is particularly important. The most natural metadata that is useful as part of subtitles is of course speaker segmentation. We also identified that hyperlinks to related content are just as important, since it can enable applications such as popcorn.js.
Potentially there is a use for metadata association with any sequence of words in a caption or subtitle, which could be satisfied with the use of a generic markup element for a sequence of words, such that microdata or RDFa may get associated. A request for such a generic means of associating metadata was made. However, the need for it still has to be confirmed with good use cases – the breakout group was out of time as we came to this point. So, leave your ideas for use cases in the requirements – they will help shape standards.
4 thoughts on “Your metadata is not my metadata”
MPEG7 covers temporal metadata, sounds like it fits the bill for what you are describing but it’s not a great web delivery format. It needs some transformation to simplify for HTML markup.
Let me know if you need further details!
@Sanj Thanks, but I know a fair bit about MPEG-7 metadata having been involved in its standardisation. It’s not quite what is required here.
TTML application of timed metadata (substitute your fave XML metadata encoding)
@sean And here’s a WebSRT version, while we’re at it:
I’d like to see something like the following header added though:
Comments are closed.